In 2003 some 72% of Americans fully supported the Abandoning of the Missions and those Sent to Accomplish so extremely Quickly after 9/11!!

At least some 95%, if not more as less then 1% serve them, not only still support the, just below, total lack of Sacrifice, they ran from any and all Accountability and left everything still on the table to be continually used if the political/military want was still in play in future executive/legislative wants!!
DeJa-Vu: “With no shared sacrifices being asked of civilians after Sept. 11", Decades and War From, All Over Again!!

DEC. 21, 2014 - Prosecute Torturers and Their Bosses

‘Operation Inherent Resolve’

Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan

* * Operation Resolute Support * *

* * Iraq: 10 Years After, 19 March 2013 - Costs of War * *

CNN Map U.S. and Coalition Iraq/Afghanistan Casualties

Civilian Fatalities in Afghanistan, 2001–2012

* Bookshelf * Iraq War Inquiry * The Torture Archive * Donate * Subscribe *

Sunday, July 3, 2016

Brit 'Iraq War Inquiry' 6 July 2016: American 'Accountability' For Iraq, Hell NO!!

MARCH 24, 2003 - Seventy-Two Percent of Americans Support War Against Iraq

* * * The British Iraq War Inquiry * * *
Accountability in America for policies supported and followed, especially by those who needed to and willingly did rubber stamped the wants for the policies 'done in All our names', what's that!!

The extremely rapid abandoning of the Missions and those sent to Accomplish after 9/11 gave rapid spread and rise of the al Qaeda ideologies blowback, especially helped by the equally rapid and rising hatreds by extremists, so called, christians in America, meme's, books, FOX speak and even slanderous blasphemy movies of not the extremist Muslims but the whole of Islam, and done in 'gods' name!! Which gave rise to, some would label even more extremist and unstable, ISIL Deadly Extremism, replacing al Qaeda!!

Tony Blair is right: without the Iraq war there would be no Islamic State

How Long Would the House GOP Have Investigated Iraq if It Cared About Iraq as Much as Benghazi?
JUNE 28 2016 - Indeed, early word on the select committee's report is that it does little to advance our understanding of how Benghazi happened and fails to make a case that Hillary Clinton committed any act of substantial incompetence or malfeasance. So that's six investigations over the course of four years, ending with a shrug.

Which suggests a question: How much time would House Republicans have spent investigating the deaths of Americans in the Iraq war if they cared as much about Iraq as they do about Benghazi? (There were two major inquiries into the Iraq fiasco, but both were bipartisan and neither involved a serving House Republican.) There were four Americans killed in Benghazi whose deaths can on some level be considered a failure by our government; there have been some 4,500 American service members killed in Iraq for whose deaths our government was perhaps even more responsible.

So, calculating proportionally and assuming that those lives cut short in Iraq are worth as much attention as the lives cut short in Benghazi, House Republicans would have launched 6,750 investigations of the Iraq war to have been conducted over the course of 4,500 years. Wouldn't that have been absurd? read more>>>

28 JUNE 2016 - Chilcot Inquiry: When is the Iraq War report being published and why has it taken so long?

The 'fix' meme's already started, actually in constant continuation as to Bengazi and thus the e-mail server, though not the e-mails of the bush admin personal and especially the using of an RNC server by Rove and company, thus saying the (R)'s in the FBI and DoJ {especially the bush admin christian law school DoJ appointee's that changed to public employee's} aren't walking in FOX speak lockstep!! And the Congress, especially Conservatives in, not laying any blame on themselves for much more then just cutting State department budgets including for security of Embassies!!

JULY 2, 2016 - Hillary Clinton interviewed by FBI over private email server

NGOs push for judicial inquiry into UK’s links to post-9/11 rendition & torture

29 June 2016 - A potent alliance of leading human rights NGOs has called for a full judicial inquiry into Britain’s role in rendition a week ahead of the publication of the Chilcot report into the Iraq war.>>>

And monetary costs never to be known, like much as to the privatized military especially the merc privatized, trading on wall street, army quickly built that morphed into an air force and intelligence gathering entity, and not only to Romania but all the Countries involved with the CIA:

July 1, 2016 - Explosive claims CIA paid millions for secret torture prisons in Romania

Chilcot report: MPs seek to impeach Tony Blair over Iraq War using ancient law
Move could be made because of Labour leader’s alleged misleading of Parliament

2 July 2016 - A number of MPs are seeking to impeach former prime minister Tony Blair using an ancient Parliamentary law.

The move, which has cross-party support, could be launched in the aftermath of the Chilcot Inquiry report because of the Labour leader’s alleged role in misleading Parliament over the Iraq War.

MPs believe Mr Blair, who was in office between 1997 and 2007, should be prosecuted for breaching his constitutional duties and taking the country into a conflict that resulted in the deaths of 179 British troops. read more>>>

Chilcot inquiry must restore trust in government, says top lawyer
3 July 2016 - Sir John Chilcot will reveal his long-delayed findings on Wednesday>>>

While the 'Iraq War Inquiry' finally released publically is sure to be political leaning there's an awful lot that can't be scrubbed that came out in the very public testimony of those questioned and America could have grasp and quickly started it's own Official Inquiry and Accountability!! Like these very very few:

Drip, drip, drip, "He recalled noting that: "the dog didn't bark - it grizzled." Don't forget - this 'grizzling' for regime change was 6 months BEFORE 9/11."". drip, drip, drip, "But there was a 'sea change' in attitude after the atrocities, with former national security adviser Condoleezza Rice targeting Iraq on the very day of the outrage.", drip, drip, drip, "George Bush tried to make a connection between Iraq and al-Qaida in a conversation with Tony Blair three days after the 9/11 attacks, according to Blair's foreign policy adviser of the time.", drip, drip, drip, "There was "a touching belief [in Washington] that we shouldn't worry so much about the aftermath because it was all going to be sweetness and light".", drip, drip, drip, "Boyce mentions the "dysfunctionalism" of Washington. He says that he would find himself briefing his American counterparts on what was happening in different parts of the US adminstration. Rumsfeld was not sharing information", drip, drip, drip...........!

January 14, 2004 - The Bush administration began planning to use U.S. troops to invade Iraq within days after the former Texas governor entered the White House three years ago, former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill told CBS News' 60 Minutes.

27 November 2009 - Blair and a deal signed in blood: PM and Bush had secret plan to topple Saddam, says envoy
But there was a 'sea change' in attitude after the atrocities, with former national security adviser Condoleezza Rice targeting Iraq on the very day of the outrage.He said: 'On 9/11 itself I had a telephone conversation and I said, "Who do you think did it?" She said, "There's no doubt it was an Al Qaeda operation".'At the end of the conversation she said, "We're just looking at the possibility that there could be any link to Saddam Hussein".' >>>

30 November 2009 - Chilcot inquiry hears Bush began Iraq war drumbeat three days after 9/11


  1. The 2002 run up to Iraqi invasion. Was a failure of the media. GW Bush would preface every speech as the medi drum roll to war. It was a bluff, and kept the media deferential to the Bush position. We needed reporters like Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein. But the times have changed. Fair AND balanced they say on FOX-TV. The balance part is spin -- conservative propaganda -- plain and simple. Our media failed to challenge Cheney and Rummie and the drumbeat to WMD's pretext to invade... ISIL is the creation of GW Bush's Administration.

  2. I wonder if you do polling how many Americans think Saddam Hussein is responsible for 911 and the Twin Towers. Bin Ladin and Hussein become conflated. And if you polled the same :Useful Idiots' on POTUS Obama's religion -- do you really think they can even can make a distinction?