Pages

In 2003 some 72% of Americans fully supported the Abandoning of the Missions and those Sent to Accomplish so extremely Quickly after 9/11!!

At least some 95%, if not more as less then 1% serve them, not only still support the, just below, total lack of Sacrifice, they ran from any and all Accountability and left everything still on the table to be continually used if the political/military want was still in play in future executive/legislative wants!!
DeJa-Vu: “With no shared sacrifices being asked of civilians after Sept. 11", Decades and War From, All Over Again!!


DEC. 21, 2014 - Prosecute Torturers and Their Bosses


‘Operation Inherent Resolve’



Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan

* * Operation Resolute Support * *


* * Iraq: 10 Years After, 19 March 2013 - Costs of War * *

CNN Map U.S. and Coalition Iraq/Afghanistan Casualties

Civilian Fatalities in Afghanistan, 2001–2012

* Bookshelf * Iraq War Inquiry * The Torture Archive * Donate * Subscribe *

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Black Sites: Refusal to Punish CIA

In Our Names!!
Federal Judge Refuses to Punish CIA for Destroying Torture Videos
October 08, 2011 - The civil case against the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) for destroying 92 videotapes containing footage of detainees being interrogated and tortured has run its course, with a federal judge refusing to punish the spy agency for its “transgressions.”

The tapes were destroyed in November 2005 under the orders of Jose A. Rodriguez Jr., the CIA’s former head of clandestine service. Rodriguez’s exposure to prosecution was limited by the fact the CIA lawyers approved his actions at the time. The destruction was carried out immediately after The Washington Post revealed the existence of CIA “black sites” where suspects were tortured.

Civil libertarians and government watchdog organizations sued the CIA after it refused to turn over records about the tapes’ destruction. The plaintiffs also requested the agency be held in contempt for destroying the recordings.

But Judge Alvin Hellerstein declined, saying to do so “would serve no beneficial purpose.” read more>>>

No comments:

Post a Comment