In 2003 some 72% of Americans fully supported the Abandoning of the Missions and those Sent to Accomplish so extremely Quickly after 9/11!!

At least some 95%, if not more as less then 1% serve them, not only still support the, just below, total lack of Sacrifice, they ran from any and all Accountability and left everything still on the table to be continually used if the political/military want was still in play in future executive/legislative wants!!
DeJa-Vu: “With no shared sacrifices being asked of civilians after Sept. 11", Decades and War From, All Over Again!!

DEC. 21, 2014 - Prosecute Torturers and Their Bosses

‘Operation Inherent Resolve’

Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan

* * Operation Resolute Support * *

* * Iraq: 10 Years After, 19 March 2013 - Costs of War * *

CNN Map U.S. and Coalition Iraq/Afghanistan Casualties

Civilian Fatalities in Afghanistan, 2001–2012

* Bookshelf * Iraq War Inquiry * The Torture Archive * Donate * Subscribe *

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Questions on Habib torture

QUESTIONS on whether senior Howard government officials misled Parliament about their knowledge of the torture of the Australian Mamdouh Habib will be asked when Parliament resumes this month

Guantanamo Bay detainee, Mamdouh Habib, and his wife, Maha. Photo: Janie Barrett JEM

May 1, 2011 - Greens senator Scott Ludlam told The Sun-Herald he would raise the issue in budget estimates and ask if the government wanted to ''clarify what it has previously put on the record'' in light of the WikiLeaks revelations last week backing Mr Habib's complaint that he was tortured in Egypt.

Senator Ludlam said he was concerned that, since the secret US documents had been made public, there had been no formal response from the government.
Advertisement: Story continues below

''The most important point now is to set a precedent to ensure this cannot happen again.''

The US files, which include a dossier on Mr Habib and his fellow Guantanamo Bay prisoner David Hicks, confirm Mr Habib's interrogation in Egypt under ''extreme duress''. {continued}

No comments:

Post a Comment