Pages

In 2003 some 72% of Americans fully supported the Abandoning of the Missions and those Sent to Accomplish so extremely Quickly after 9/11!!

At least some 95%, if not more as less then 1% serve them, not only still support the, just below, total lack of Sacrifice, they ran from any and all Accountability and left everything still on the table to be continually used if the political/military want was still in play in future executive/legislative wants!!
DeJa-Vu: “With no shared sacrifices being asked of civilians after Sept. 11", Decades and War From, All Over Again!!


DEC. 21, 2014 - Prosecute Torturers and Their Bosses


‘Operation Inherent Resolve’



Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan

* * Operation Resolute Support * *


* * Iraq: 10 Years After, 19 March 2013 - Costs of War * *

CNN Map U.S. and Coalition Iraq/Afghanistan Casualties

Civilian Fatalities in Afghanistan, 2001–2012

* Bookshelf * Iraq War Inquiry * The Torture Archive * Donate * Subscribe *

Friday, February 4, 2011

Iraq Invasion Ordered Weeks After 9/11

This is born out in the testimony of the Brit Iraq War Inquiry especially in the early testimony!

I used the following, and there were other references, in a post during the early phase of the Inquiry, day nine to be exact:

Drip, drip, drip, ""He recalled noting that: "the dog didn't bark - it grizzled." Don't forget - this 'grizzling' for regime change was 6 months BEFORE 9/11."". drip, drip, drip, ""But there was a 'sea change' in attitude after the atrocities, with former national security adviser Condoleezza Rice targeting Iraq on the very day of the outrage."", drip, drip, drip, ""George Bush tried to make a connection between Iraq and al-Qaida in a conversation with Tony Blair three days after the 9/11 attacks, according to Blair's foreign policy adviser of the time."", drip, drip, drip, ""There was "a touching belief [in Washington] that we shouldn't worry so much about the aftermath because it was all going to be sweetness and light"."", drip, drip, drip, ""Boyce mentions the "dysfunctionalism" of Washington. He says that he would find himself briefing his American counterparts on what was happening in different parts of the US adminstration. Rumsfeld was not sharing information"", drip, drip, drip...........!

Confirmed then in the testimony now confirmed by rumsfeld which shows they were much more interested in destroying Iraq, and taking down Saddam, then what happened on 9/11, this just gave them the excuse to do so and as we've been witness to, In Our Names, concern about al Qaeda and bin Laden were way down their list no matter what had happened!

Invasion ordered weeks after 9/11, says Rumsfeld


February 4, 2011 - FORMER US president George Bush asked his defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, to draw up plans for the invasion of Iraq just two weeks after the atrocities of September 11th, 2001, Rumsfeld reveals in Known and Unknown: A Memoir , which will be released on February 8th.

The Bush administration’s false claim that Saddam Hussein was personally involved in the 9/11 attacks was believed by nearly 70 per cent of Americans.

Rumsfeld took his title from his own allegation that Iraq intended to provide weapons of mass destruction (WMD) to terrorists: “There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don’t know we don’t know,” Rumsfeld told a press conference in 2002.

Mr Rumsfeld now says he regrets saying “We know where they are” regarding Saddam’s alleged WMD. None were ever found. And Mr Rumsfeld is sorry he dismissed the European allies who opposed the invasion of Iraq as “old Europe” and “the chocolate-making countries”. {continued}

In and around the Sept 11th date since a phrase has arisen "We will not forget!", well guess what, the multiple 9/11's we did to Iraq over the years since "They will never forget!"!!

3 comments:

  1. It seems the writer of this piece is implying the 9-11 ATTROCITIES WERE COMMITTED BY ARABS. IT WASN'T CLEARLY SAID ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. AS AN ENGINEER, WHO HAS A SCIENTIFIC DEGREE, I CAN SAY WITHOUT ANY RESERVATION WHATSOEVER THE WTC BUILDINGS CAME DOWN DUE TO A "HIGH ENERGY-QUICK RELEASE MECHANISM" WHICH CAN OCCUR VIA EXPLOSIONS. FORENSIC FAILURE ANALYSIS SCIENCE INDICATES THAT THERE WERE SPECIAL EXPLOSIVES USED. MY PART OF OBSERVATION IS THIS. ( I HAVE DONE RESEARCH ON EXPLOSIVE FORMING OF METALS). IN THE RUBBLE OF THE TOWERS THERE WERE HUGE CROSS SECTION, LONG BEAMS BENT IN THE SHAPE OF A "U" THAT "SHOW NO CRACKS ON THE OUTER EDGE OF U" THIS CAN ONLY HAPPEN IN SO-CALLED """ HIGH STRAIN RATE DEFORMATIONS """. HIGH STRAIN RATE MEANS SAID DEFORMATIONS HAPPENED "IN THE BLINK OF AN EYE". THIS CAN HAPPEN ONLY USING EXPLOSIVES OF SOME SORT OR SOME MECHANISM BY WHICH HUGE AMOUNTS OF ENERGY IS RELEASED SO AS TO CAUSE A SHOCK WAVE. THE MERE COLLAPSE OF THE BUILDINGS COULD NOT CAUSE 180 DEGREE BENDS WITHOUT CAUSING MULTITUDE OF CRACKS AT UNDERNEDGE OF THE "U". SO, " NO CRACKS MEANS VERY QUICKLY RELEASED (EXPLOSIVELY RELEASED) ENERGY. THEN IT SHOWS THAT IF EXPLOSIVES OR SIMILAR QUICK RELEASE HIGH ENERGY SOURCES WERE USED THE ONLY WAY THIS CAN HAPPEN IS BY, AT LEAST, THE ALLOWING OF THE US AUTHORITIES. COUPLED WITH ALL THE OTHER FORENSIC EVIDENCE IT CAN BE CONCLUDED BEYOND THE SHADOW OF SLIGHTEST DOUBT THAT NO ONE, BUT NO ONE , COULD HAVE COMMITTED THE 9-11 ATROCITIES OTHER THAN "A ROGUE GROUP IN OR NEAR THE US GOVERNMENT'. PERIOD.

    ReplyDelete
  2. On a separate issue that was required as a consequence of my remarks above i would like to say that CCR is doing a good job. Would you please recommend to all your readers to watch """THE MONEY MASTERS """ ON UTUBE. AFTER WATCHING AND HOPEFULLY, ENTIRELY UNDERSTANDING THAT VIDEO, evaluate the following.
    Democratic and Republican parties are errand boys of a foreign based special interest group. They do not serve THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES. Therefore, an organization like CCR could lead an effort to gather Green Party, constitution party, social democrats, all progressives, etc. into a what we may call a POPULIST PARTY OR PEOPLE'S PARTY, so that people's interests are also taken care of.
    I believe CCR can get with some similar organizations to accomplish this.
    Regards, Anonymous in the USA.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Anonymous, let me clue you in on something, you want to be taken serious Take Off The Cap Key, that's first, second is As An Engineer You Showed You're Not By Doing Replies Like That!!!!!!!!!! Now go back and get a real education and not off wacky websites and then parrot!!

    ReplyDelete