Admiral Lord Boyce, UK's top officer during conflict, said he requested clarity from prime minister over invasion's aims
27 January 2011 - Britain's most senior military officer at the time of the invasion of Iraq told the Chilcot inquiry he repeatedly asked Tony Blair for an assurance that the war would be lawful and was emphatically assured the aim was never "regime change".
In striking contrast to previous evidence about the former prime minister's war aims, Admiral Lord Boyce said : "Our policy absolutely and specifically was not regime change".
Blair's closest advisers, including Sir David Manning have told the inquiry that the former prime minister assured President George Bush he was willing to undertake regime change. Lord Turnbull, cabinet secretary at the time, described Blair as a "regime changer".
Boyce made clear he was deeply concerned about the legality of an invasion. Lord Goldsmith had warned more than once that regime change was "not a legal basis for military action".
Boyce told the inquiry today: " I made it clear to the prime minister in January 2003 (once we had started to deploy our forces), that I would require an assurance of the legal base of the conflict. This was reiterated more than once in the following weeks, and formally and explicitly in March, once it became clear that it was probable that coalition forces would invade once political approval was obtained". {continued}
We know the costs in blood, never to totally in civilians, but what of the costs in treasury still not paid! How much to buy the coalition of the willing, how much to buy the CIA rendition and secret prisons globalizing torture, how much for the decades to come as to the results of both wars, more. Neither has been paid for, rubber stamping and rapid deficit rises started Before 9/11 and nothing as to the peoples responsibility, the VA, as to just one of the needs in those results from!
Pages
In 2003 some 72% of Americans fully supported the Abandoning of the Missions and those Sent to Accomplish so extremely Quickly after 9/11!!At least some 95%, if not more as less then 1% serve them, not only still support the, just below, total lack of Sacrifice, they ran from any and all Accountability and left everything still on the table to be continually used if the political/military want was still in play in future executive/legislative wants!!
DeJa-Vu: “With no shared sacrifices being asked of civilians after Sept. 11", Decades and War From, All Over Again!! DEC. 21, 2014 - Prosecute Torturers and Their Bosses ‘Operation Inherent Resolve’
Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan
* * Iraq: 10 Years After, 19 March 2013 - Costs of War * * CNN Map U.S. and Coalition Iraq/Afghanistan Casualties
Civilian Fatalities in Afghanistan, 2001–2012 * Bookshelf * Iraq War Inquiry * The Torture Archive * Donate * Subscribe *
* * Operation Resolute Support * *
Friday, January 28, 2011
Iraq War Inquiry: 'regime change not the goal' {?}
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment