Protect US interests on Iraq?

See there's a problem with this kind of thinking and obstructionist ideology. Anyone with a working mind can easily read between the lines, and put together with other statements, of what's stated or written. Sure they may be wrong in what they're conclusions may be but it depends on what went before and after that those conclusions of what might really be that's important and raises more questions to be asked causing more reality to service.

Wikileaks continue to grab headlines

More embarrassment for governments

01 Dec 2010 - The Wikileaks saga continues to gain public and media attention.

As more information from over a quarter of a million US Embassy cable messages is made public, governments around the world are squirming in embarrassment and anger.

The documents are being released in stages over the coming months, with one of the latest from the whistle-blowing site showing a document relating to the Iraq war.

The leaked dispatch was sent by Ellen Tauscher, US under secretary for arms control and international security. In it she reports that the previous Labour government would restrict the reach of the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war in order to protect US interests.

A spokeswoman for the inquiry would not comment on the leaks

This latest revelation is one of the more serious to date - most of the documents are more like insider gossip than serious political disclosures; although are still highly embarrassing to governments and individuals. {read rest}